Food fight for religious schools resolved. Religious schools need not follow new Biden administration Title IX guidelines in order to receive federal funding for school lunch programs, according to new guidance from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). The announcement comes amid a major battle that somehow wraps up gender identity and cafeteria food.
This food fight started when the USDA announced in May that it “will interpret the prohibition on discrimination based on sex found in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and in the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 … to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.” This brings it in line with a Biden administration executive order issued last year.
Title IX previously applied only to sex-based discrimination but is being expanded to cover discrimination based on sexuality or gender identity. Many oppose the change, suggesting that it smuggles in certain knowledge about gender—and all that entails with regard to sports, bathrooms, etc.—under the auspice of mere non-discrimination.
In the USDA’s May announcement, it said schools participating in federal nutrition programs including the National School Lunch Program would have to update their non-discrimination policies and signage to match the new guidelines. That meant including sexual orientation and gender under the umbrella of sex—a development against which many conservatives and religious schools pushed back.
A number of people have characterized the fight over the new USDA guidelines as Republicans wanting to discriminate against transgender kids in school lunch programs, sometimes engaging in some majorly disingenuous rhetoric to make the point. For instance, California’s Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom characterized the opposition as “arguing LGBTQ children should starve.”
So, 20 Republican attorneys general have filed a lawsuit arguing LGBTQ children should starve. https://t.co/76YPmaHCkG
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) July 27, 2022
This is a mischaracterization. There’s no evidence that school systems have been or are planning to deny trans students equal access to lunch programs or anything like that. Nor have there been any reports of low-income students denied food assistance because they’re gay.
Rather, opponents of the USDA guidance—including the 22 states suing over it—object to the larger change regarding Title IX and gender identity, and see the USDA announcement as a way to force them into accepting it by holding lunch money hostage.
Religious schools are off the hook, however. They can claim an exemption and don’t even have to file paperwork to do so, the USDA said in an August 12 memo. Title IX “includes some exceptions, including one permitting an institution to be exempt on religious grounds if there is a conflict between Title IX and a school’s governing religious tenets,” it pointed out. “USDA regulations do not require a religious educational institution to submit a written request for a Title IX exemption in order to claim that exemption.”
But the battle continues for public school systems.
The lawsuit filed by 22 states in July, “seeks to stop the Biden Administration from enforcing an expansive and legal interpretation of federal antidiscrimination laws under the threat of withdrawing key food assistance program funding,” per a press release from Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery. The complaint says the USDA changed its guidelines for school lunch programs and food stamp benefits without allowing for proper input as required by the Administrative Procedures Act.
“To be clear, the States do not deny benefits based on a household member’s sexual orientation or gender identity,” the complaint stressed. But where the USDA’s old policy”prohibited discrimination only ‘in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA,’ the new policy seemingly applies to each program-administering’institution’ as a whole,” it says.
“Because Congress has declined the Biden Administration’s call to rewrite Title IX and other statutes,” and “because the Department of Education has so fen not prevailed in the States’ lawsuits against its” guidance, “the Biden Administration seemingly decided to use the USDA to accomplish its rewriting of Title IX through other means.”
The States are also challenging the Biden administration’s interpretation of Title IX more broadly. Twenty states have filed a federal lawsuit against the US Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In July, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee temporarily blocked the enforcement of the rules.
Reminder: the Espionage Act is still bad.
The fact that the Espionage Act may be used against Trump does not magically make it good. It has a terrible history of abuse. Government has employed it to avoid scrutiny and chill free speech, and it violates basic tenets of due process. Nobody should be cheerleading this law.
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) August 14, 2022
More on the Espionage Act’s uses here.
Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) has also been criticizing the Espionage Act this week.
The espionage act was abused from the beginning to jail dissenters of WWI. It is long past time to repeal this egregious affront to the 1st Amendment.
Repeal the Espionage Act – The Future of Freedom Foundation https://t.co/3KCgujpS9z
— Rand Paul (@RandPaul) August 13, 2022
In related news: “Former President Donald Trump claims to have verbally declassified the sensitive records the FBI seized from his Mar-a-Lago compound. It’s not as or outlandish an argument as widely believed—if he can prove it happened,” write Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney at Politico.
Six more states consider legalizing recreational marijuana use. “Voters in at least five states will decide whether to legalize marijuana this fall, and a similar measure may yet qualify for the ballot in one more state,” notes Reason‘s Jacob Sullum. “If all six initiatives are successful, recreational use will be legal in half of the states, underlining the untenability of continuing federal prohibition.”
Marijuana will be on the ballot this fall in Arkansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota. It may also be up for a vote in Oklahoma.
• Federal prosecutors have informed Rudy Giuliani that he is a target in an investigation into criminal election interference in Georgia.
• “Record numbers of migrants are being arrested while crossing the southern US border with Mexico,” The Wall Street Journal reports. “Border Patrol agents have made about 1.82 million arrests at the southern border so far in the government’s fiscal year,” which “beats the record set last fiscal year, which was 1.66 million apprehensions in the year ending September 2021.”
• Gerrymandering “is making elections less competitive,” warns Reason‘s Eric Boehm.
• The Justice Department doesn’t want to let us see its work.
• How will Republican “defund the FBI” rhetoric play among GOP voters?
• Josh Barro suggests that “Democrats’ insistence on ‘treating the cabinet as an identity-politics Rubik’s cube’ got us an incompetent-yet-unfireable HHS secretary.”
• “San Francisco’s latest Tenderloin drug crime crackdown is doomed to fail.”
• A battle over nudity is heating up in France. “Naturists are not only at war with the libertines but also now challenged by a cult within naturism calling themselves les nudienswhich seeks to normalize a state of liberty, equality and nudity in public spaces.”